Talk:Deadpool & Wolverine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Roy Thomas Jr being credited as Wolverine co-creator[edit]

Saw this article and didn't know if there was any merit in mentioning how Thomas (apparently) is going to be credited as one of Wolverine's co-creators, when that hasn't really been the case for much of the character's existence. Ref goes into it more. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:22, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also saw that. It is probably worth a mention somewhere since the deal seems to have been made specifically for this film, but I am also wary about getting into too many details about it here. There should probably be more details on this at the Wolverine article or maybe Thomas's own article? - adamstom97 (talk) 21:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to already be handled somewhat at the Wolverine article and should also be at Thomas' article. Given Marvel's track record of using "Based on the Marvel Comics" as the main based on credit, I think this would be referring to the "created by" lines also used in the credits. It may be worth noting though I think we should probably wait for a more independent, third-party source to verify Chase's claims. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bill Finger wasn't credited as Batman's co-creator in any mass media, but that all changed with Dawn of Justice after his family appealed. Perhaps something similar happened here. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think unlike Finger, Thomas has never truly ever been considered one of Wolverine's creators, which is explored more in the Bleeding Cool link. Hence why I was 50/50 on if it warranted mentioning here. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 12 April 2024[edit]

In cast, Chris Hemsworth needs to be credited as Thor, as the new CinemaCon footage has confirmed he will be in the movie: https://www.gamesradar.com/deadpool-and-wolverine-new-trailer-footage-loki-sacred-timeline-cinemacon/ 2.98.147.221 (talk) 19:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done This claim has been reverted already with the rationale that it is use of archive footage and not necessarily notable. Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel Concern[edit]

Levy stated recently that this isn't Deadpool 3. Does that mean this isn't a sequel to the previous 2 films, or is he just teasing us and referencing films like Godzilla Vs Kong? 64.88.88.151 (talk) 16:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They want us to think of it as a true two-hander between Deadpool and Wolverine, rather than a Deadpool movie that Wolverine happens to appear in. But from a development perspective this is still the third Deadpool film. - adamstom97 (talk) 16:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
so basically he's trying to have us think it's like Godzilla Vs Kong or Batman V. Superman but it's still technically a sequel to both Deadpool films just like Godzilla Vs Kong is a sequel to both Godzilla films 64.88.88.190 (talk) 16:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Similar to comic books that have their own separate franchise with character and plot tie-ins to their own respective original universe, this is the same.
Separate note to which I hope someone can just accommodate a reply to without much of a debate on the note being within a reply; Which premium format will be the absolute best premium format for viewing that *doesn't require glasses* based on current advancements in technology? Also I believe we should be asterisking which formats require glasses (can't be the only one concerned about this). Also, currently listed formats for viewing is "IMAX, RealD 3D, Dolby Cinema, 4DX, Cinemark XD, and other premium formats" and I believe we should be investigating which are these other premium formats to have a formal list as there may be a new technology we might need to include which may be making its' debut. 207.136.91.93 (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOTFORUM, this is not the place to have that discussion. - adamstom97 (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well I feel we can accommodate it as "Premium formats" is a generic term and doesn't specify. 207.136.91.93 (talk) 12:09, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As adam noted, we do not need to list every single format it is available in. We are not a WP:TVGUIDE. Though, I did adjust it to point directly to premium large formats and included its initialism (PLMs) as, from my experience working at movie theaters, this is a relevant aspect of release formats and provides clarity for those who may be unfamiliar with that terminology. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:02, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poster[edit]

It would be good if someone uploads the other poster? Link:[1] Maybe it would be good to have both posters in the article. 190.21.185.245 (talk) 00:21, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no need to have both posters there. Non-free images should be kept to a minimum. —El Millo (talk) 02:51, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But Marvel Studios posted both posters in their social media, so I don't know. 190.21.190.250 (talk) 03:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This one was used obviously because it features Deadpool more prominently, as this is still realistically the third Deadpool film as a two-hander with Wolverine. Besides, there will be an updated theatrical release poster eventually which will supersede these two anyway, so there's no need to toy with these ones. Trailblazer101 (talk) 03:49, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Deadpool_%26_Wolverine&oldid=1222217340"