Talk:Deanna Merryman
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deanna Merryman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
![]() | Deanna Merryman has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Promoted to GA quality
[edit]This article was reviewed and successfully promoted to GA quality. Review at Talk:Deanna Merryman/GA1. — Cirt (talk) 16:44, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Please keep lede as GA version
[edit]- Let's please keep the lede intro sect as the stable WP:GA quality version.
- Per WP:LEAD, the lede intro sect should summarize the entire article's contents and be able to function as its own standalone summary of the article itself for those that don't read the body text.
- WP:LEAD says: "The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important aspects. The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points, including any prominent controversies."
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Update: I've made a couple attempts at compromise, and trimmed the lede sect down a bit from the prior stable WP:GA version. Hopefully this looks a bit better now, — Cirt (talk) 17:16, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- Biography articles of living people
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Low-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class Pornography articles
- Low-importance Pornography articles
- GA-Class Low-importance Pornography articles
- WikiProject Pornography articles
- GA-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles