Talk:Debuccalization

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Phonetics Task Force.

Sound files?[edit]

Even after reading the article I don't know how the debuccalization sounds. A file with two or three examples of usual and debuccalized word variant could be very usefull. (Preferrably in more than one language.) Šedý (talk) 10:19, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good suggestion. The way it manifests depends on language. — Æµ§œš¹ _{[ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ]} 01:57, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese[edit]

The adaptation of Korean loanwords in Japanese is based on a single source where the author only takes two informants and transcription in karaoke machines, which is highly unreliable, also the author does not make such a strong statement as was originally written here, so I've corrected it. Honestly, I would even leave it out completely taking it as basically unsourced and even if true, marginal to the phonology of Japanese. Muflon 83 (talk) 20:40, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, remove it if the source is that bad. I don't see a problem. Peter238 (talk) 20:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. They aren't even loanwords. I'd be surprised if Japanese speakers use juk (porridge), mok (neck) etc. as loanwords. So they're just "What happens if you give Japanese speakers some unpronouncible word and tell them to repeat it?" 73.70.140.46 (talk) 05:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Debuccalization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130624212809/https://files.nyu.edu/jdw412/public/james.whang/main_files/Whang.pdf to https://files.nyu.edu/jdw412/public/james.whang/main_files/Whang.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]