Talk:Defense Intelligence Agency/Archives/2019/December
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Requested move 3 December 2019
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved back to original title as proposed, to revert recent undiscussed move. Station1 (talk) 00:31, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Defense Intelligence Agency (United States) → Defense Intelligence Agency – Revert undiscussed move made in October. The American Defense Intelligence Agency is the Primary Topic as it precedes, and is much larger than, any other (India, Nigeria, South Korea) by a large margin. Defense Intelligence Agency already redirects here. page views. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 16:15, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- @Anthony Appleyard: just checking to confirm that this was undiscussed. If that's the case it probably meets the criteria for WP:RM/TR. SITH (talk) 21:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- I have re-opened this prematurely closed RM. Also, @Mark Schierbecker:, I have corrected the proposed target title. Previously, the proposed target title was the same disambiguated title that the article currently already uses! GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:46, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, User:GeoffreyT2000. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 05:11, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support. Actually, only the South Korean agency competes with it, as the others are at Defence Intelligence Agency with the Commonwealth spelling. Clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:25, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
- Support only article with the exact name and Defense Intelligence Agency still redirects here anyways. A hat note will be sufficient to distinguish from entities called Defence Intelligence Agency.– BrandonXLF (talk) 22:52, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.