Talk:Degeneria

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fiji Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fiji, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fiji on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FijiWikipedia:WikiProject FijiTemplate:WikiProject FijiFiji articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Interkingdom homonym

Note this diff: [1]. I don't have time to fix it right now, but Degeneria should be a disambiguation page for the plant and animal genus. Although Degeneriaceae is monotypic, it seems like the article should be titled by the family name (since Degeneria is ambiguous). Plantdrew (talk) 07:31, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Plantdrew: I understand the logic of this (old) comment, but there's still no article at Degeneria (helminth) (the redlink at Gorgoderidae) so I think it's ok to have an article at "Degeneria" and another (eventually) at "Degeneria (helminth)" with hatnotes to disambiguate. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:35, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Plantdrew and Peter coxhead: I substituted the link Degeneria (helminth) by Degeneria (trematode), because "helminth" is unique and ambigious. We have two same disambiguator terms (Rostellum (helminth) and Tegument (helminth)), but these are probably also bad and ambigious--Estopedist1 (talk) 17:06, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Estopedist1: there some 182 disambiguated articles pertaining to animal anatomy, as well as disambiguated plant anatomy/morphology terms, terms pertaining to physiology or behavior. Dab terms in these areas could probably go through some standardization, but I think that should a separate thing from sorting out dab terms for genera (there's also an issue of systematic bias where articles on anatomical terms applicable to all vertebrates or mammals focus almost exclusively on humans). Plantdrew (talk) 22:00, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Plantdrew and Peter coxhead: I did article for the monotypic Degeneria (trematode). I suggest this solution: DAB for Degeneria with the content

Degeneria may refer to:
* Degeneria, a monotypic genus of trematodes in the family Gorgoderidae with the only species Degeneria halosauri
* Degeneria, genus of plants, only genus in the family Degeneriaceae

--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Estopedist1: it's conventional that articles begin with their title, so I made some edits to Degeneria halosauri.

Personally, I think the two articles, Degeneria and Degeneria halosauri are fine as they are right now. A Google search shows that almost all the top hits for "Degeneria" are the plant, so this is the main topic. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:51, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Degeneriaceae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]