This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
A fact from Delaware and Hudson Canal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 October 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
I recently took a look at the external links in this article and cleaned them up per WP:EL and I'll explain my rationale for each one here. I removed www.centuryhouse.org, www.dhthc.org, and www.dandhconservancy.org because they were links to organizations that seek to take care of the canal. These are irrelevant to the article, they would fit on an article about each organization itself but a link to any organization with a goal would be promotional and borderline NPOV. I removed the link to canalmuseum.org similiarly because Wikipedia is not a travel guide. The link to the Neversink Valley Area Museum was kept because the museum's role in the canal was discussed in the article. The links to the Canal Liner Park and orangecountygov.com contain information on the canal that isn't in the article and would be hard to work around without a copyvio. The link to the map stays, of course, as do the links to the valuable engineering pictures. Themfromspace (talk) 00:01, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
With all due respect, I think the museum link should stay. At least until we start a separate article about it. Daniel Case (talk) 01:10, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Obviously I changed my mind. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have noticed that the canalmuseum.org is no longer being kept up to date and from what I can tell the Historical Society seems to have vanished other then asking for money. Makes one wonder what the money goes too when members don't receive anything back for being a member. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.171.42 (talk) 19:38, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The physical museum seems to be in good shape, although I have not been able to visit in a while. Daniel Case (talk) 04:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Since the legal designation of Pennsylvania is "Commonwealth", not "State", I have altered the usage where appropriate.
216.222.232.18 (talk) 22:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
there is an unclear sentence in the lead paragraph[edit]
"Between 1828 and 1899, its barges carried anthracite coal from the mines of Northeastern Pennsylvania to New York City via the Hudson River, both stimulating the city's growth and encouraging settlement of a sparsely populated region." It is unclear which city the sentence is referring to. Can someone with knowledge in this area please fix this?--Pink Bull (talk) 01:29, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"City" is pretty clearly meant to be New York City (which is why I used it). NE PA is a region, not a city, therefore the antecedent should be clear. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
At a second reading, I realize that the sentence is not as unclear as originally thought. I nevertheless edited the sentence to reflect my original concern, figuring that another reader might be similarly confused. I now see that you modified my edits replacing the geographic entities with the terms "latter" and "former." I would have preferred my version because it does not require the reader to go back and check which is the former and which is the latter. However, I'm new around here and don't want to bother with an established writing style. --Pink Bull (talk) 22:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I realized, you did raise a valid point. One might think NYC was in NE PA as it had been written. So I made sure now the two are perfectly clear. Daniel Case (talk) 22:21, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
