Talk:Deliberation Day

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Evaluation[edit]

Hello! After looking at this stub of a page, I feel like there is some more information that can potentially be added. I was looking at the references, and while the article itself is pretty generic (and short), one of the sources comes from a magazine about failure, implying a biased viewpoint (and that too unreliable, as it is some online magazine instead of an academic journal, etc.) Anyone else have an opinion? Isha9 (talk) 23:48, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The "Failure" magazine isn't really biased - but the introduction mischaracterizes Deliberation Day. The proposal is to bring together all registered voters, not a representative sample, for discussion. See the Center For American Progress description, or, of course, the original book, though that's harder to link to. Also, there's no requirement that participants vote - you can attend and then choose not to vote.

I'm a new editor. Is it appropriate to remove the citation to the Failure article given this inaccuracy, even though there is some other useful information in the interview?