Talk:Demographic history of Greece

This article makes no sense

There were more people in Greece in 500BC than there are now? 86.93.208.34 (talk) 07:28, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well that makes some sense considering the history. I am not necessarily defending the article but you have to understand Greece has been through some very rough times and many disasters across modern and medieval history. The Greek population, for example, dramatically decreased during the Turkish occupation, we still haven't recovered from that population decline 176.58.137.219 (talk) 18:50, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong information in the article

This article is not about the (Demographic history of Greece), the title is misleading, this article is a copy of Population of the Byzantine Empire. Is the subject of the article only the ethnic Greek population of these regions? Or all inhabitants of these areas? Why is Asia minor added? The numbers are also too high and very exaggerated.DragonTiger23 (talk) 08:38, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Of course Asia Minor,as well as other areas, are added. Greeks lived there. And, to clarify, the subject of the article is the ethnic Greek population within and outside of Greek rule. I personally have only written the modern part of the article(after Greek independence) and can assure you the numbers(at least the ones I wrote about)are not exaggerated 176.58.137.219 (talk) 18:54, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Demographic history of Greece. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001063022/http://www.world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=&men=gpro&lng=en&dat=32&geo=-92&srt=pnan&col=aohdq to http://www.world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=&men=gpro&lng=en&dat=32&geo=-92&srt=pnan&col=aohdq

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate for deletion nomination

The article is written as a personal work. Yet, even a personal work needs sources and references; otherwise, it has no scientific merit. Unless the article is significantly improved, it could be proposed for deletion. -The Gnome (talk) 09:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]