Talk:Demon core/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 13:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:59, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- No DABs, one dead link.
- Images appropriately licensed.
- Trinity nuclear test gadget's core Using the nickname of the Trinity test bomb is probably going to be pretty confusing for most readers.
- I thought that gadget only referred to the Trinity device? the components of the Trinity and Nagasaki gadgets
- Link supercritical on first use, link rad, neutron, gamma
- Done But the various types of criticality all point to the critical mass article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- True, but it's hard for a new reader to grasp the difference between them from the text, without clicking on the link. Can you try to add a short bit to clarify the differences? If you can't think of something simple, don't sweat it, I'm just trying to get something that an educated reader can skim over and grasp the essentials without having to click on the link.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Where are you on this?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- True, but it's hard for a new reader to grasp the difference between them from the text, without clicking on the link. Can you try to add a short bit to clarify the differences? If you can't think of something simple, don't sweat it, I'm just trying to get something that an educated reader can skim over and grasp the essentials without having to click on the link.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Done But the various types of criticality all point to the critical mass article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
- While not a requirement, you've got different date formats in your refs.
--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)