Talk:Denmark–Eritrea relations/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 10:18, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:33, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Appear to be reliable sources, assume good faith for Danish sources, could do with better consistency in publisher deatils, and langauge details (if not English).
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- It seems rather thin, fails the broadness of coverage criterion, if there isn't more then it can't really be a good article.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Appears one-sided - all about Denmark's position, little from the Eritrean pov.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- stable
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- One licensed and tagged image form commons used
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- A fairly clearcut fail. there probably isn't enough matwerial to make this a good article ever. The prose is poor, the lead is inadequate, the article focusses exclusively on Denmark's part in the relationship, there is nothing about Eritrea's part. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:37, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: