Talk:Der brænder en ild/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ikhtiar H (talk · contribs) 08:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quick review[edit]

This article immediately fails to be a good one. It isn't broad in coverage and has very few references. Need more contents such as development, filming etc. Ikhtiar H (talk) 08:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No offense, but I'll be asking for a new review by a more experienced editor. Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 11:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonas Vinther, I understand that according to you, I had failed to measure up to my priorities as a reviewer. A diversion has been molded. I sincerely apologize in advance for underlying such a dispute and being the bone of contention. In this case, it will be an astute move and turnaround to provide a leeway for an "experienced editor". Thus, the best way to welcome a third person is "asking for a second opinion". In the interim, this article should remain in the field of nominees. I appreciate your inconvenience drive by. Thanks. Ikhtiar H (talk) 12:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 15:11, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A clear quickfail candidate. No references in the plot section, hardly any content outside of the plotsection, very few sources. This is not a GA quality article, and probably never will be since this movie is not the subject of a significant literature. Here are a few other references that could be used to expand [1][2]·maunus · snunɐɯ· 17:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- First things first: film plots don't require references per WP:MOVIEPLOTS. You will find no GA-listed film article which has references in the plot section. Secondly, the book suggestions you mentioned are of no use at all as they simply mention the movie and doesn't go into details not already covered in the article. Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 17:56, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, plotsections don't require references, but GAs do, and this GA is almost entirely plot. Noone should pass a GA where the bulk of the content is unreferences - regardless of whether that is the plot section. I could certainly find a way to use those two sources, but it is up to you if you want to use them or not.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 18:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, they mention no details not already covered in the article. Best, Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 18:19, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong about that, but that is your business.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 18:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

·maunus, this source very briefly mentions the 1920 novel, not the film, and this source, again briefly, talks about the plot of the 1962 film. Which specific parts do you belief could be used in the article? Best, Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 18:47, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The first source mentions the negotiations about the script between ASA and Morten Korch (including the fact that Dennow died while he was finishing the script), the location of the farm (which had been used in earlier films and burned down), Lau Lauritzen as stunt coordinator. The second could be used as a source for the currently unsourced plotsection.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 18:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but all that stuff about the script negotiations between ASA and Korch as well as the farm location is all related to The Red Horses, not this film (fordi jeg lavede "De Røde Heste", fik jeg, uden at der blev diskuteret noget som helst, ret til at lave samtlige af hans bøger). Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 19:02, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ohhhhhhhhhhhh... now I see (undskyld, læste ikke hele siden!). Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 19:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It seems it is infact the same farm in both movies, but that it had burned down and been rebuilt for "Der braender". Seems interesting to me.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 19:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a nice find. I have to walk my dog now, but will implement the whole thing in the article when I get back. Hopefully it will fill out the gabs in the articles GA-nomination. Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 19:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]