Talk:Desecration
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Image copyright problem with Image:House of the people.jpg[edit]
The image Image:House of the people.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --16:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Image removed[edit]
I removed the image of the Symmachi–Nicomachi diptych because it wasn't desecrated by Christians for being an "idol", as implied by the caption. That part of the Diptych was held in a monastery for centuries, being part of a reliquary, until the revolutionaries defaced it, burnt it and threw it into a well at the end of the XVIII century, because they couldn't tell it apart from images of kings they were destroying throughout northern France. 78.34.51.65 (talk) 11:37, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Scope.[edit]
It's only about religion, or broader? --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii 12:24, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
Bamiyan.[edit]
The destruction of Bamiyan Buddhas was not desecration, it was simply fundamentalism, because there were no Buddhists in Afghanistan at the moment. --Yomal Sidoroff-Biarmskii 12:27, 15 August 2017 (UTC)