Talk:Deshastha Brahmin/GA2
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: -- Cirt (talk) 05:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
Failed "good article" nomination[edit]
This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of December 20, 2010, compares against the six good article criteria:
- 1. Well written?: Fails here. Sourcing concerns throughout. Large chunks of unsourced text. Problematic issues with flow and organization, including very large paragraphs in some places, and instances of extremely short paragraphs in others.
- 2. Factually accurate?: Fails here. Quick fail. Section Festivals tagged with needing additional citations for verification. (Also odd template which appears to be a footer template displayed at the top of that section, that should be moved.) Lots of citation needed tags still present at time of GA Review.
- 3. Broad in coverage?: Festivals sect seems disorganized, with smatterings of info presented. There is indeed lots of text, but presentation, structure and overall organization of it could be greatly improved.
- 4. Neutral point of view?: Talk page has raised some questions about the Festivals sect, I would recommend posting to talk pages of multiple related WikiProjects for some outside input regarding this.
- 5. Article stability? Lots of recent activity, including some questionable IP edits from earlier this month. Would recommend keeping a close eye on that. Talk page inspection shows unresolved section, Addition of details of festivals.
- 6. Images?: Some of the images have been subject to analysis at Wikimedia Commons, suggesting all the images could benefit from an independent image review check.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— -- Cirt (talk) 04:06, 20 December 2010 (UTC)