Jump to content

Talk:Destanni Henderson/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 23:07, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I'll be taking a look at this article for the January 2022 GAN backlog drive. If you haven't already signed up, please feel free to join in! Although QPQ is not required, if you're feeling generous, I also have a list of GA nominations of my own right here.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

[edit]
  • Citation needed for middle name and birth date
  • "as a freshman" → "during her first year"

Early life and high school career

[edit]
  • "was born in her hometown" is redundant; here would be a good place to include her birth date
  • and began working to improve her skills This reads quite vague; presumably she was doing that to some degree throughout her childhood

Recruiting

[edit]
  • "recruit" should be linked here as it is in the lede
  • Mention what year A'ja Wilson was recruited

College career

[edit]
  • "recorded a freshman season-high
  • Swap the clauses in the first phrase of the second paragraph

National team career

[edit]
  • Good

Personal life

[edit]
  • Information about her parents should be in the early life section

References

[edit]
  • Good

General comments

[edit]
  • Images are properly licensed and relevant
  • No stability concerns in the revision history
  • Copyvio score looks good

Putting on hold to allow nominator to address comments. Ping me with questions, and let me know when you're finished. — GhostRiver 00:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostRiver: I have addressed all of the points. Sportzeditz (talk) 13:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 03:56, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nicely done @Sportzeditz and GhostRiver:! Very impressive editing Sportzeditz. I'm working on the Diamond Johnson if you feel like taking a look, it could use some of your in depth knowledge. --Wil540 art (talk) 15:44, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]