Talk:Destruction layer
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Recently removed text
[edit]I've just removed the following text from the article:
Destruction layers are often found associated with a change in subsequent pottery styles or material culture artefacts, indicating an invasion by a foreign people or intrusive element.
I've removed it because I think it oversimplifies the point and it doesn't have a reference to back it up. The article broad splits destruction layers into two groups: "natural causes (for example earthquakes), or as a result of a human action" (I previously added 'human' as a replacement for 'military' since not all human caused destruction is military in nature, eg: arson). With natural causes a change in material culture wouldn't necessarily follow, which is a key point made by Torrence & Grattan.[1]
I think the main focus of the sentence was that following destruction layers caused human action there may be a change in material culture, but again that doesn't necessarily follow. It places all the emphasis on external forces (ie: invasions) whereas civil war could be a cause. Similarly, a change in material culture may indicate a new group but that group could come from within that society rather than an invasion, or the change could be a response to the destruction. In short there are too many variables for the sentence I removed to be especially helpful to a reader. Richard Nevell (talk) 17:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Torrence, Robin; Grattan, John (2002). "The Archaeology of Disasters: Past and Future Trends". Natural Disasters and Cultural Change. pp. 1–18.