Talk:Destruction of Warsaw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

B-class review[edit]

This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 21:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

POV[edit]

The claim that Nazi Germany planned to ‘raze’ Warsaw even before the start of the uprising is not backed up by any source. This article seems to confuse plans like the Pabst Plan with the destruction caused by the uprising and subsequent German actions. This point of view is problematic. — 37 (talk) 23:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter in this case that the article combines references to the Pabst Plan and then details the destruction of the city by German demolition units shortly after the Warsaw Uprising. The key theme of the article here is that the German authorities sought for a long time to destroy the city in order to remove the center of Polish nationally identity. The destruction of the city was always based on this key issue. Thus the tag simply has no relevance in this case, Germans wanted to erase the city one way or another — sooner or later. --E-960 (talk) 11:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Planned destruction of Warsaw. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Phony quote[edit]

There is no proof that Adolf Hitler ever said that:"Warsaw has to be pacified, that is, razed to the ground." Which is why no reliable source is given in the article, just some book that doesn't give a source neither. --105.0.3.240 (talk) 18:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020 edits[edit]

Preserving here by providing this link; my rationale was: "1939, 1940 events etc seem off-topic", especially in a section that is called "Warsaw Uprising's aftermath". --K.e.coffman (talk) 05:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Does this article need to exist?[edit]

The vast bulk of the article rests on a few non-academic sources: touristy sites, an "FAQ" which does not itself cite any sources, etc. Also see my edit notes. Are there any reliable, scholarly sources that testify to a planned, deliberate and pre-meditated German destruction of the City of Warsaw, which is what this article purports to be describing? I agree with the comment above from 2015 that this article seems to be conflating to unrelated things to push a Polish nationalist POV. If this article's continued existence can be justified, it'd need a comprehensive overhaul, which I have neither the time nor the expertise (nor the inclination) to perform. Ya hemos pasao (talk) 05:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are plenty of sources about this, frankly this is the first time I'm hearing any insinuation it wasn't real. A lot of lesser-known subjects that deal with Eastern European (and generally non-English) history will be poorly-written due to the lack of general attention to them, but that doesn't mean that it didn't happen. I am actually surprised that this article is so short Rousillon (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 12:29, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]