Jump to content

Talk:Deusdedit of Canterbury/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 20:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am reviewing. Pyrotec (talk) 20:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Overall summary

[edit]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


You've done quite a few of these articles before!

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Well referenced.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    Well referenced.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Well illustrated.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Well illustrated.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations, I'm awarding this article GA-status. You now have quite a list of these. Pyrotec (talk) 08:32, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]