Talk:Deviation (statistics)

Statistics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Merge or keep? I vote that we keep.[edit]

I am using Wikiversity in an effort to develop open source cirricula, and for that reason, am keenly aware of Wikipedia's limitations as a teaching tool. Wikipedia does not and should not attempt to be a textbook. There is no proper way to make a long article about such a basic concept as Deviation. But, for the textbook writer, a clear understanding of basic definitions is essential. When writing teaching materials, terminology must be clearly defined, both in an early chapter, as well as in a glossary.

I need this page, and the question is which wiki should host it. Wiktionary is not intended to be a glossary and is entirely unsuitable. In theory, Wikiversity is structured to contain glossaries and someday that might happen. But at the moment Wikiversity is so underdeveloped that a glossary is out of the question. For one thing, students are apt to edit it, and they are pretty much free to write whatever they wish.

For me it is essential that these "glossary" items be kept in Wikipedia where more editorial control is maintained. I will link to this article from Wikiversity

--guyvan52 (talk) 11:35, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Guyvan52: Merger proposal withdrawn. Fgnievinski (talk) 03:42, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]