Jump to content

Talk:Devil May Cry 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleDevil May Cry 2 is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 20, 2007Good article nomineeListed
March 26, 2007Featured article candidatePromoted
June 20, 2007Featured topic candidatePromoted
June 2, 2008Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
July 24, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
October 19, 2009Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
April 4, 2011Featured article reviewDemoted
Current status: Former featured article

Trish?

[edit]

Should this article mention the fact that Trish is an unlockable character? -Sherwood-Nightshade 02:39, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This Featured Article has 3 dead external links which can be found here. Please fix them as soon as possible. Thanks! --haha169 (talk) 00:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Find "Official US PlayStation Magazine Review" is currently dead. — Dispenser 01:11, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Work needed

[edit]

Hi everyone - Work needs to be completed to bring this article back to FA status or a FAR may result. Please see the comments at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Devil May Cry 2/archive1 for a starting place. That review is currently on hold, but will proceed if no action is taken in the next week or so on the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 23:44, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from Wikipedia:Featured article review/Devil May Cry 2/archive1; comments can be made below if needed:

Comprehensiveness issues
  • Article fails 1(b) (comprehensiveness). This is an article on a highly-publicized 2003 video game. With the Internet plus print sources. There is currently nothing from any print sources (i.e. PlayStation Magazine, Game Informer, Electronic Gaming Monthly, GamePro, and so on), in which there would definitely have been. A video game article like this should certainly have much more than 11KB of readable prose.
WP:NFCC issues
  • Article fails FA criterion 3
  • All images currently fail WP:NFCC#8; that is, none of the fair-use rationales clearly spell out how they increase readers' understanding of the article as opposed to the prose alone; merely saying that the images are "informative" is not enough.
  • To say the least, having both File:Dmc2dantesword.jpg and File:Dmc2dantedt.jpg are not necessary; one of them needs to go, as they are both gameplay images which are showing the exact same thing.
  • On the same reasoning as above, having two pictures of Dante and Lucia (File:Dante & Lucia.JPG and File:Dmc2diesel.jpg) are likewise not necessary, and one of them needs to go.
Verifability issues
  • Article fails 1(c) (well-researched and verifiable). There are large portions of unverified content all over the article. Citation formatting is very inconsistent.
Prose
  • I would (though weakly) claim that this fails 1(a) (well-written); I can't put a finger on it, but the prose leaves a little more to be determined. Perhaps it's because I was looking for full, complete paragraphs (such as like in the Plot section, which I think is one of the decently-written sections here).

For the reasons stated above, I feel this article does not currently meet the standards for Featured Articles at this time. –MuZemike 23:48, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dropped the duplicated images, done a brief copy edit. The article does have a little from print sources, EGM, Official PSM, and Play. Geoff B (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure File:Dmc2diesel.jpg is needed either, given that there are possible options for free alteratives (not showing the VG characters, of course.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 13:28, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If additional sources become necessary, the online print archive contains numerous reviews for this game. They are from the following sources:
Hope they're useful. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 04:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Devil May Cry 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:18, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Devil May Cry 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:42, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]