Talk:Dianella (plant)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dianella (plant) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I'll change the main photo to full plant when I take one & move berry photo to a gallery at the end. Not sure what species the berry photo is of Darrell.barrell
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dianella (plant). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110903044317/http://www.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/plant_info/aboriginal_bush_foods to http://www.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/plant_info/aboriginal_bush_foods
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://farrer.riv.csu.edu.au/ASGAP/APOL29/mar03-14.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Some removed statements lacked citation
[edit]I have removed the following statements: "Dianella is not well understood taxonomically and is in much need of revision." and "Not all taxonomists recognize the genus. In one paper on the classification of Xanthorrhoeaceae, Dianella and six other genera were subsumed in the genus Phormium". The first statement seems to be a POV, no citation is given for it. No citation was given for the second either, which appears to be an erroneous reference to the family Phormiaceae which contained Dianella and 6 other genera, as shown here: Watson, L., and Dallwitz, M.J. 1992 onwards. The families of flowering plants: descriptions, illustrations, identification, and information retrieval. Version: 5th March 2018. delta-intkey.com/angio MisterCDE (talk) 10:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
- I agree. It looks as if the species within the genus may be changed and expanded (based on an as yet unpublished PhD thesis – see the abstract), but there seems no dispute over the genus itself. Peter coxhead (talk) 11:19, 8 March 2018 (UTC)