Talk:Diann Blakely

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women writers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because I've only just started it, and I have not had time to edit it yet. Please allow me time to make the necessary changes.

I'm also confused as to what a "Reliable Source" is. I've included a couple of different reviews by others of Ms. Blakely's work, but this does not seem to be good enough. Please advise - with a specific, concrete example - of what constitutes a reliable source, as I do not find Wikipedia's entry on the subject sufficiently explanatory.

Have you taken a look at WP:RS? ttonyb (talk) 01:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have; thank you, Ttonyb. The books, etc. that I have listed; poems; interviews; reviews - are those not all reliable sources? What would be more reliable than that? That's where my confusion lies. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirtrdblues (talk • contribs) 06:06, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have begun the process of requesting copyright permission from Ms. Blakely per Wikipedia's instruction. Dirtrdblues (talk) 07:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted because... --74.167.23.24 (talk) 02:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have given full permission for this information, and more to come, to be added to the entry. If there are any problems, please contact me at once:

My assistant is attempting to set up a Wikipedia entry for me using the same biography I have given my webmaster. The information was written by me and both have my full permission to use it, and everything given within the one-paragraph bio, plus the publication information, is fully verifiable.

74.167.23.24 (talk) 02:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)Diann Blakely[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Diann Blakely. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]