Talk:Dianne Walker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 February 2020 and 7 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anonymous User Asdf.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:27, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright problem[edit]

Hi, I've reverted this page back to an earlier version as it appears that material has been added from http://www.debbieallendanceacademy.com/id80.htm and may thus present a copyright problem. - Politepunk 14:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are wrong, I believe that their bio was lifted from Wikipedia. Their website is promoting a 2006 tap dance festival and the person who added the biography here did so in November of 2005. Dwain 16:23, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds credible, please feel free to revert back to a more recent version. - Politepunk 17:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non Notable? What?![edit]

Did the person who suggests this article be deleted even read it? I can't believe that someone would suggest that Walker is non-notable. Maybe tap dancing ain't your thing, but to suggest that she is non-notable is ridiculous. As for sources, some of them are included within the article. Friuli (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 23:13, 20 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]

  • Yes, the person is notable, but not because you say so--and there were no reliable sources in the article until I added them. Drmies (talk) 19:51, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What? Not because I say so? What the heck is that supposed to mean? I didn't say so because it's obvious that she is notable. I didn't have to state the obvious. But, I see that you did by saying, "Yes, the person is notable." Does this mean she is only notable because you said so? What a brilliant statement! I guess the Boston Herald isn't a reliable source then, huh? I'm glad you took the time to do something worth while by adding some sources, but we could have done without the attempt at wit. Friuli (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, it wasn't an attempt at wit. I was merely stating the facts. I think your attempt at wit is the unspoken claim that "The Boston Herald has called her "America's First Lady of Tap" is enough reason to call this article referenced? No, you meant that quite seriously. And it is not obvious that she is notable, not obvious at all, not to me. Proof, my friend: read up on Wikipedia:Verifiability before your next rant. I have proven that she is notable because I have added references to reliable sources that state that she is notable. Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 22:17, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dianne Walker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]