Talk:Die Hand Die Verletzt/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 (talk · contribs) 19:09, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Will review this soon. Ruby 2010/2013 19:09, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

Prelims

• No dab or EL issues, the single image looks fine
• There is a little recent instability; there appears to be a disagreement with an IP

Further issues

• "The episode received positive reviews, praising the writing." This sentence doesn't quite make sense
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• Change usage from Jim to Ausbury for consistency
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• Added directing credits, guest stars to production section (everything in lead must be in main body of article); identify who Dan Butler is (who don't indicate he is a guest star in production section)
• "...out of an idea from Glen Morgan's idea..." Idea...idea (redundant)
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• Chris Carter -> Series creator Chris Carter
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• Wikilink Glen Morgan and James Wong
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• season four -> the fourth season (also add wikilink)
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• "...were based on internet X-Files fans..." -> were based on fans from the Internet of The X-Files (or something similar)
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• The episodes title -> The episode's title
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• :While fake frogs were considered for the scene where they fall from the sky, the producers decided to change to real ones, dropped from a short distance, as, according to Carter, the "fake ones looked too bad and didn't hop away after command"" Should be split up into 2 sentences; or add a semicolon
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• "Dan Butler was terrified of the animal, being unable to talk while shooting the scene in the basement, and the make-up team not needing to apply fake sweat on the actor.[7]" Sentence needs to be rewritten
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• 10.2 million households or 10.7 million people? (compare lead and production section)
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• Reception section: Series creator Chris Carter -> Chris Carter
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• Use consistent accessdate formatting (compare ref 10 to 11)
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• Use consistent date formatting (compare ref 9 to 11)
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
• Also: identify Wong and Morgan's relationship to the series (producers? just writers?) Ruby 2010/2013 04:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Done. GRAPPLE X 04:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

On hold for seven days while above get addressed. I'd also like to hear your thoughts on the IP issue. Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 03:33, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Got seeing to these when I saw the review go up. As the one who dealt with the IP, I think it's a one-off blip. I dropped a talk page note to them when it looked like it might go beyond 3RR, explaining the issue, and it hasn't occurred since. If you want to leave this a couple of days, or even the full holding week to be sure of it then that'd be understandable. It's probably what I would do. GRAPPLE X 03:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Your changes look good. Per your recommendation, I'll keep the review on hold for a few more days to ensure there is not instability from that particular IP (or anyone else). Thanks, Ruby 2010/2013 04:16, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Seems fair. Best to play it safe. GRAPPLE X 04:23, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Looks to me like the IP activity has stopped.--Gen. Quon (talk) 18:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Yep, stability looks good. Passing article. Nice work! Ruby 2010/2013 01:53, 25 January 2012 (UTC)