Jump to content

Talk:Die Zeit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is There and English Language Version Available?

[edit]

If so, a link should be placed in or below the article.

70.209.255.129 (talk) 03:09, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

physical size

[edit]

Please clarify: does "very large physical size" mean that it's printed on a large paper format, or simply that it has lots of pages?

I think that means the large paper format. According to de.WP, Die Zeit uses the Nordisch format - noticeably larger than many (regional) daily newspapers. de:Die Zeit also notes that this large format has been the subject of satire. As a national and a weekly newspaper, it has more pages than many regional dailies, but I don't think that's very surprising. 85.180.13.126 (talk) 14:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

protestant

[edit]

How is "Die Zeit" protestant? As a regular reader I can't see any preference for some religious denomination. fpesth 11:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the? Time

[edit]

The name of the publication is probably better translated as simply "Time" rather than "The Time." That's just how abstract nouns work in German: you have to use a definite article to refer to them, whereas we don't do that in English.

More logically translated as "The Times." Sca (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why? That'd translate as "Die Zeiten" - plural. G-41614, not logged in.

Agree that, for the reason stated above, "Die Zeit" = "Time," not "The Time" and certainly not "The Times." I've been a professional translator of German to English for almost 30 years. The statement in the article that "Die Zeit" "literally" means "The Time" is incorrect. JohnMason (talk) 02:39, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

High brow

[edit]

The paper is considered to be high brow. While I don't necessarily disagree, "high brow" has negative connotations that seem inappropriate here and "is considered to be" is simply glossing over the fact that this is a personal opinion. (This stylistic tool has a name - which I forget - and is discusses as one of the things to avoid in writing Wikipedia articles) 172.179.101.199 12:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info box

[edit]

Rather odd that the infox box is headed by a large Die Zeit flag (logo) that is immediately repeated by a (10-year-old) Die Zeit front page used as the graphic therein. (The info box in the German Wiki article contains only text.) Sca (talk) 15:44, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Die Zeit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]