Talk:Diethyl phthalate
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
NPOV
[edit]I've removed the entire section called "Are there possible long-term exposure effects on children? The question remains open." Although some editors have made good efforts to improve this section, I don't think it's salvageable. Asking and answering a rhetorical question in the very title of the section - and then carrying on in the same style throughout, citing sources only to dismiss and argue against them without citation - is original work and completely out of line with Wikipedia's rules. 206.45.170.157 (talk) 12:24, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Diethyl phthalate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090201134838/http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/Chem_Background/ExSumPdf/Diethyl_phthalate.pdf to http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/htdocs/Chem_Background/ExSumPdf/Diethyl_phthalate.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720210742/http://www.nioz.nl/public/annual_report/2006/baars.pdf to http://www.nioz.nl/public/annual_report/2006/baars.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 12 December 2016 (UTC)