Talk:Dinheirosaurus/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs) 18:43, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prose[edit]

This aritlce is written in acceptable prose. It doesn't contain punctuation, spelling, capitalization or grammar mistakes.

However, the lead section can be improved and styled. Gug01 (talk) 22:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]

Referencing and plagiarism[edit]

This article is not plagiarized. It properly attributes any copied material to its source. There are inline citations, but there are multiple mistakes that cannot be easily fixed in the {{cite book}} template (chapter/page is unnatributed multiple times).

Done. IJReid (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Review it: Now that the references has been cleaned up, I can say the referencing is perfect. Gug01 (talk) 20:34, 2 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]

Point of view and covering[edit]

This article is written from a neutral point of view. This article in addition broadly covers over a subject, and goes into detail where necessary.

Stability[edit]

This article is stable. It has had no edit wars in its history, and is not undergoing a current edit war.

Overview[edit]

Although the majority of the article is good, the problem with the referencing is serious. As I cannot fix this referencing, I will put it on hold to see if the article will be fixed in a few months. The chapter/page needs to be attributed to the books.

Review the review a few hours later: This article is now perfect to be a good article. Thus, it is now a good article and no longer just a nominee.