Talk:Dirk Gently (TV series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding the Reception Section[edit]

Ok so here is the quote from reviewer AA Gill

AA Gill, who had previously expressed a dislike for the source novel when discussing the pilot episode[39] was less complimentary, writing in the Sunday Times on 11 March 2012 "Who'd have guessed that this would ever get recommissioned?...It has to get a nomination as the greatest waste of the most talent for the least visible purpose or reward."

If he failed to appreciate the source novel then how can his opinion have any value whatsoever? For one thing the show was created to be appreciated by fans of the novel. But even more importantly anyone who fails to appreciate Douglas Adams, has a sense of humor that is suspect at best, and definitely has no real business recommending what is or is not funny. Probably the type of person that finds a pie in the face to be the height of humor, while scratching their heads at a cleverly worded sentence.

Obviously my second point is only my opinion, but shouldn't my first point be enough to remove his review?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dirk Gently (TV series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]