Talk:Dissolved gas analysis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This seems to be a translation from another language, or prepared by someone with an imperfect command of the English language. There are numerous grammatical errors which makes for a confusing article. However, it seems technically sound.

  • I think it advisable to remove the Application section. The interpretation of the results is less cut and dry and the explicit application of across the board standard is not recommend. There are several factors such as KV of the unit and load dependence and manufacture and unit type that are necessary consideration before making states as the ones made in that section. It would also be in following with the less ow to approach that is suggested below. Cat8head (talk) 02:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggest merges[edit]

- I am unfamiliar with the multiple gas extractor but from the brief extract here it seems as though its a proprietary DGA method. It may be better to shorten the length of the paragraph here and link to the multiple gas extractor article Cat8head (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- I am unfamiliar with the oil sample tube but from the brief extract here it seems as though its a proprietary DGA method. It may be better to shorten the length of the paragraph here and link to the oil sample tube page. I am quite new here and did not want to make substantial revisions to what others have put forth, but if there is enough consensus i believe shortening these two experts and linking them is appropriate. Cat8head (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- I disagree with the merger as Transformer 'Oil' is not the only insulating fluid that can be evaluated via the DGA method. Also there is a growing use of DGA on other electrical equipment such as Oil Circuit Breakers, and Load Tap Changers in addition to transformers. I can see the value in less of a how to approach. Cat8head (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2011 (UTC) (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]