Talk:Division of Denison (state)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: Tasmania / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Division of Denison (state) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled[edit]

I think that we should be merging the Tasmanian electorate articles with the Federal electorate articles. Since Tasmanian electoral boundaries are simply a copy of federal electoral boundaries, and none of the articles are any more than stubs. I think it is of value to have federal and state electoral results listed together, particularly since geographical and demographic information is identical. Braue 07:10, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Initially the articles were merged but then it was decided to seperate the information. Probably because they are different political entities. I'm not sure people looking up federal electorates really want to read about state MHA's and state election statistics. However I agree both articles are stubs and there isn't really much need for two of them. --Kyle sb

Well if the debate has already happened somewhere then I won't change it. Braue 00:54, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Clark (state) article?[edit]

Should the Denison and Clark state articles be merged, as is the case for Braddon/Darwin and Lyons/Wilmot? AustralianSwingVoter (talk) 05:02, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a merge proposal in Talk:Division of Clark (state). Marcnut1996 (talk) 08:27, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]