Talk:Djibouti and the World Bank

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 October 2018 and 15 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Carolinamarchetti.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

Peer Review POLI 144D Information seems unbiased and neutral which is the point. The article has flow and provides good information. Overall the information is clear and structured. Overall the references seem to be reliable and you do provide a lot of sources but … next comment. Reference 14 is not cited properly. Angelavpoli144 (talk) 02:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Angelavpoli144[reply]

Wiki Comments[edit]

Good scholarly sources but should add a title for reference 14 (documents.worldbank.org (PDF)). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinkim28 (talkcontribs) 01:25, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jinkim28 (talk) 03:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Jinkim28[reply]

Wiki Comment: Balanced Coverage[edit]

In your Country Partnership Strategy, in your second to last paragraph. It says,"Lastly, social tensions continue to grow as the unemployment rate grows higher, especially among the young population.[4]" I would clarify what young population means with a general range of working age in Djibouti. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinkim28 (talkcontribs) 01:32, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Jinkim28 (talk) 03:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Jinkim28[reply]

Commentary 12/5/18[edit]

1)Lead section; Conveys a sense of the subjects importance, hypothetically could be lengthened

2)Structure; well structured, all paragraphs have separate, distinct and useful points. The table added is a well integrated addition into this article. Headings are meaningful. Section organization is purposeful.

3)Balanced coverage; WB, information is novel, yes. Sections are all relevant. Viewpoints are represented insofar as possible given the assignment length.

4) Neutral Content Language is objective; yes. Cannot guess perspective. No unnecessary phrases. No excessive claims made. Claims appear well sourced.

5) Reliable Sources. Source count check. Citation check, Reliable sources check. Sources balanced check. Statements sourced and in own words check.

Eriadorian (talk) 01:33, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Eriadorian (talk) 01:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Eriadorian[reply]

WIKI comment: lead section[edit]

The article should have a lead section, so that reader can gain a preview/overview of what the article is about and if the article is of value to readers. Jinkim28 (talk) 03:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Jinkim28[reply]


Jinkim28 (talk) 03:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Jinkim28[reply]

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinkim28 (talkcontribs) 01:37, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] 

Wiki Comments:[edit]

1. Reliable Sources: When you write, "The CPS clearly states that the two main pillars consist of reducing country's vulnerabilites and strengthening the business sector. With reference to the former, the objective is to design programs and policies that address the country’s human security issues.", I would reference where the CPS clearly states this in order to be reliable.

2. Balanced Coverage: When you write, "In fact, the 2017 estimates for poverty show that 35% of the population lives in poverty, 21% in extreme poverty and that the Gini coefficient has raised from 40% to 42% in 2017.[5]", Add when the Gini coefficient was 40% and when it was raised to 42% by adding the exact date.

3. Clear structure: There is clear structure but add more coverage on how the other projects in Projects section is of relevance or link them where it can explain what these projects are doing.

4. Neutral Content: The tone is neutral overall. Good job.

5. Again add a lead section in order to give a good overview of article. Additionally the lead section should reflect the most important information in the article.

Jinkim28 (talk) 03:22, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Jinkim28[reply]

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jinkim28 (talkcontribs) 01:49, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]