Talk:Doe v. Reed

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Untitled[edit]

I left a few inline comments in the article. Zelse81 (talk) 23:34, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I edited this page because of a major error that had misled me. The previous text stated that Scalia disagreed with the majority opinion as presented in the first paragraph of the Opinion section. But I found on p. 10 of Scalia's opinion that he didn't disagree. Here's the source: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/09-559.pdf. After making that correction, I then deleted the entire paragraph about Scalia because the only reason for the paragraph would now be to present the quote of Scalia that it contains. However, in view of Scalia's agreement with the majority, his quote consists of a tangent that would need to be developed in its own right to express its full implications, namely, that there should be no secret ballot. Besides, the quote should have had a reference citation to the above link and page number. Fibbit (talk) 01:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]