Talk:Domestic robot

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Domestic robot was copied or moved into Personal robot with this edit on 16 October 2018. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Misurma948.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Taylor pierre, Ashlyncatto, Itsninahtulangow, Kirsten82599, Ttylea36, Lars7599, Mcasini, Georgichiavacci, Maddiesgay, Darianrodriguez.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Classification

The classification of domestic robots is not exhaustive and it is not fully explanatory. It should be re-written by someone who has more knowledge about this subject. Ovidiu pos 10:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of red links

In the list of robotic vacuums there are lots of red links and a laundry list of Samsung products. Any objections to pairing it down to the ones that are actually a) on the market and b) have WP pages about them? -- Autopilot (talk) 13:41, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid Ad Page

What is this, a commercial? Put your ads somewhere else and put REAL domestic robots on the page instead. Dishwashers are robots. Microwaves are robots. Televisions, toilets, kettles, ovens, freezers, fridges, digital clocks, remote controls, telephones, washing machines, stoves, air conditioners, DVD players, coffee makers, CD players, deep-fryers, and heaps more! Why are you putting steel frizbees on this page? Are the makers paying you? COME ON PEOPLE! --JezzDawga (talk) 09:54, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The reason the things you mentioned aren't on the page is because those are referred to as machines, not robots. For a more accurate description of a robot see the Wikipedia articles on robots and robotics. The pictures is not of a Frisbee, it is a carpet cleaning robot. Mysterytrey talk 21:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What's with the brand listing domination?

I can understand the listing of models of domestic robots throughout time and their progress and functions, but this page seems to be little about serious content and more of a list of domestic robot products. This is supposed to be an article informing about the subject, right?

how about adding the geeky technical details and the history of domestic robots etc etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.145.139.28 (talk) 12:34, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of coming across as an ad page. It should explain the different types of domestic robots, while informing a reader about each. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.20.9 (talk) 20:29, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

-We fixed the summaries so that they don't sound like an advertisement. Would it be appropriate to add one or two examples of different models? Rkwa 20:23, 28 March

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Domestic robot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071024203219/http://www.scat.or.jp/nrf/English/index.html to http://www.scat.or.jp/nrf/English/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Robotic pet

I believe that this can be a redirect with potential, if someone is ever willing to expand it into a fully sourced article. But, currently, it serves little purpose as its own article, as it is entirely unsourced. The information is reiterated in this article. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:47, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Robotic pets are almost commonplace (on shop shelves, if not homes) There is no reason at all to go backwards from the stub article we have, to a merge or redirect. Instead it should be expanded. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:55, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how it's going "backwards" - as nearly no content is lost in the redirect, besides dubious claims. As I said, it should be marked as a Redirect with possibilities, but currently it's better off as a redirect that can be expanded as a section of this article, rather than an unsourced stub._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 11:08, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Domestic robot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090228170802/http://blogs.spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/2008/03/21/10_stats_you_should_know_about_robots.html to http://blogs.spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/2008/03/21/10_stats_you_should_know_about_robots.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:24, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon Alexa/Echo

Amazon Alexa was recently added as an example of a domestic robot used for entertainment. Technically, the hardware device in question would be the Amazon Echo. Should we categorize voice-activated virtual assistants and smart speakers as robots? Are there reliable sources that support this? Feel free to discuss. –dlthewave ☎ 18:12, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]