Talk:Dominica at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Will be reviewing this article as part of a GAN sweep. Comments will appear soon. MWright96 (talk) 06:26, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Lead
[edit]- Specificy what specific events Duranona and Thea LaFond partook in the lead. -- Done
Background
[edit]- "(1 athlete per sex)" – The number 1 should be spelt out per MOS:NUMERAL -- Done
- Durañona was selected as the flag bearer for both the opening and closing ceremony – closing ceremonies -- Done and shortened the link
Athletics (track and field)
[edit]- The first instance of Duranona should have the ñ in place of the first ordinary n -- Done
- Wikilink wildcard to Wild card (sports) as you have done in the lead -- Done
- In the key mini-section, all notes bar the first one should be removed since they are not used in the article --Looks good?
References
[edit]- All content is accurately and reliably sourced
Overall a good effort has been made and does not go off topic. On hold until all the above issues have been resolved. MWright96 (talk) 07:19, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
- @MWright96: Should all be fixed. Dat GuyTalkContribs 15:13, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
- @DatGuy: The notes bar looks much better and these improvements merit this article's promotion to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 16:48, 24 October 2017 (UTC)