Talk:Don't Let Me Down (The Chainsmokers song)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Don't Let Me Down (The Chainsmokers song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140103022302/http://australian-charts.com/bestall.asp?page=1 to http://australian-charts.com/bestall.asp?page=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Roses (The Chainsmokers song) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:02, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Don't Let Me Down (The Chainsmokers song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161228174302/http://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2749413/ to http://oe3.orf.at/charts/stories/2749413/
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/dont-let-me-down-feat.-daya/id1079537189
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/dont-let-me-down-feat.-daya/id1079537189
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://itunes.apple.com/za/album/dont-let-me-down-feat.-daya/id1079537189
- Corrected formatting/usage for https://itunes.apple.com/au/album/dont-let-me-down-feat.-daya/id1079537189
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Odd wording in the section "Background and Composition"
[edit]In the sentence,"The song has a double-time tempo of 80 beats per minute and a key of G♯ minor.", the first part seems to be an unusual or wrong way of describing the tempo. I am not a musician or any form of musical expert so I am uncertain myself. That said, I am pretty sure that musical tempo is described by Latin words. Further, double time in music...as I understand it...refers to halving the tempo resolution. In this case...I think it should to be referred to as "andante or andantino" instead of "double-time" I may be wrong about this so I decided to leave this comment in the hopes that somebody more knowledgeable can check it out. 66.215.187.187 (talk) 06:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Nick F.S.