Talk:Don't Rush (Kelly Clarkson song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) 08:19, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

I figured I might as well review this since I really like this song.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Made a few minor grammar tweaks here and there. There was some awkward phrasing here and there, and Dann Huff's name has two N's, not one.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All of the sources are reliable and broad in coverage.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Has all the aspects of a good song article.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   The cover art was tagged as being too big, but I disagree with this taggging.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: