Talk:Donald E. Ballard

CMH Citation

this section repeatedly lists his rank (rate) as 'HC2C'. this is without question incorrect for the period, and i find it very hard to believe that such a citation would have gotten this wrong. don ballard was at that time a 'hospital corpsman second class', (e-5), correctly abbreviated 'HM2'. i know this from personal experience. my dad, during wwii, was an electrician's mate third class, abbreviated 'EM3C'. during my naval service,(1964-68) i was a seaman recruit (SR),hospitalman apprentice (HA), hospitalman (HN), hospital corpsman third class (HM3) and hospital corpsman second class (HM2). another website, posted by the navy's naval historical centre, says that ballard was a third class at the time of the action, and gives a different wording of the citation, at no time referring to him other than as 'petty officer ballard'. not to mention the fact that he can't have a 'memorial' statue anywhere, since he's apparently still quite alive.details, people, details.Toyokuni3 (talk) 05:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC) i gotta start reading articles more completely before commenting. this one has a lot of problems. ballard is probably not 'retired' from the navy. in military parlance, 'retired' means collecting a pension, either after 20(or more) years service, or after incurring some disability while on active duty. since the citation describes no injury, and since he was able to qualify for the ng, the latter seems improbable. the former is obviously not so. since he turned down an opportunity for a direct commission, he apparently obtained some educational qualification for a commission. readers might like to know about that. it looks to me in the picture that he may be wearing a staff corps device on his lapel. medical service corps? details, people, details.Toyokuni3 (talk) 05:18, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Donald E. Ballard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070522013907/http://www.kansasguardmuseum.org:80/mohballard.html to http://www.kansasguardmuseum.org/mohballard.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070522013907/http://www.kansasguardmuseum.org:80/mohballard.html to http://www.kansasguardmuseum.org/mohballard.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070518072740/http://www.kansasguardmuseum.org:80/hof.html to http://www.kansasguardmuseum.org/hof.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 15 December 2016 (UTC)