Jump to content

Talk:Dorsal veins of the penis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge proposal

[edit]

Superficial dorsal vein of the penis and Deep dorsal vein of the penis are short articles with a good amount of overlapping imagery and information. I don't think there is a lot more that can be said about them individually, so I propose merging them into a single article covering both. bd2412 T 02:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose merge. To some audiences, the importance between these veins is very important, even if the articles about them are so far only minimally developed. --Arcadian (talk) 04:00, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
How much more developed can they possibly get? We can at least merge until there is enough material on each to sustain an article of respectable size. bd2412 T 04:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the differences can be discussed in the article and when the time comes individual articles can be developed, but this one is a tiny stub, it may help to join it with a larger article.

Kateweb (talk) 05:12, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images inappropriate

[edit]

Since this is an article on human anatomy, shouldn't the images we use be of penises that have not been modified by surgery?

Not if the circumcision makes the veins easier to see. (P.S. Use ~~~~ to sign your posts on talk pages.) Jwoodward48wiki (talk) 22:00, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:37, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]