Talk:Dose (biochemistry)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ernst.ch. Peer reviewers: Danicroi.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:46, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Page move
[edit]The page name is more than a little complicated, WP:NAME probably doesn't support it. What about moving it to Dose (pharmacology)? WLU (talk) 21:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- The term "dose" is equally relevant to the field of nutrition, but the article pharmacology says that substances it deals with are called "pharmaceuticals". Nutrition deals with nutrients, which generally aren't considered pharmaceuticals. Therefore, I've renamed the dose article to dose (biochemistry) to be neutral relative to these two fields, and implication-free. The Transhumanist 20:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Could this page be divided into pharmaceutical dosing and nutritional dosing and toxicology dosing? The three seem to be quite different and grouping them together doesn't work well here. Also why is only 1 source referenced through the whole page? Much progress has been made in dosing science since 1958 and the page asserts alot of claims and uses no evidence to support them. --Ernst.ch (talk) 17:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Dose-response relationship and Dose-effect relationship
[edit]Need your input at Talk:Dose–response_relationship#Difference_between_"Dose-Response"_and_"Dose-Effect" on whether there should be a separate article on dose effect. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC)