Jump to content

Talk:Douglas W. Owsley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeDouglas W. Owsley was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 24, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
March 13, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
September 30, 2013Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 20, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Douglas W. Owsley of the Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of Natural History has overseen the forensic examination of over 10,000 human remains from over an 8,000-year time span?
Current status: Former good article nominee

Please don't delete Talk:Douglas W. Owsley/GA1

[edit]

Please don't delete Talk:Douglas W. Owsley/GA1. It's part of the GAN review process and as such is listed in the article history by a bot. Deleting it disrupts the GAN review process. Thanks! MathewTownsend (talk) 12:55, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matthew, the GA review (Talk:Douglas W. Owsley/GA1), wasn't deleted. An editor simply removed its transclusion into this page. That's what's normally done when a GA review is finished to free up space on the article's actual talk page. Talk:Douglas W. Owsley/GA1 is now linked from the Article Milestones banner at the top of this page. I'm going to go ahead and remove the transclusion again. Best, Voceditenore (talk) 13:13, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Douglas W. Owsley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Douglas W. Owsley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]