Jump to content

Talk:Dragon C106

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Daily Mail

[edit]

Unfortunately, Wikipedia policy currently does not support use of the daily mail as a source. Please replace that.

(I don't write, or necessarily agree with the decisions. My opinion is irrelevant in Wikipedia. I just follow them) (for more information, see WP:DAILYMAIL)

Eddie891 (talk) 23:16, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This may ultimately lead to Dragon V1 capsules being reused as much as 3 times.
Parachutes replaced
Many inspections and X-ray examinations followed to recertify the capsule for flight to NASA standards.

[1]

I have removed the passages supported solely by The Daily Mail sourced information. -- 65.94.169.56 (talk) 06:50, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Mark Prigg (1 June 2017). "First a recycled rocket, now a second hand spacecraft: SpaceX attempt to launch Dragon capsule for the SECOND time delayed due to weather". The Daily Mail (London).

Article

[edit]

@JFG: What do you think about this? Since you created the latest B1029 article, how about this subject? -- 65.94.42.131 (talk) 05:12, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Third flight

[edit]

Will there be a third flight of this capsule? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.61.176.165 (talk) 06:48, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]