Talk:Dragon Quest Swords

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Title

Shouldn't this be Dragon Quest Swords: The Masked Queen and the Tower of Mirrors --> AND instead of AT. [1] jaco♫plane 10:47, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have the press release in front of me, and yes, it should. --Codemonkey 03:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kenshin Dragon Quest

Is this game simply "similar" to Kenshin Dragon Quest, or is it a port? 71.203.209.0 04:27, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to everything I've read, including IGN's speculation, this will NOT be a port of Kenshin Dragon Quest. Rather, it will feature similar gameplay mechanics. --Tristam 01:02, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Role-playing game?

Based on what descriptions we have so far of the gameplay, Dragon Quest Swords doesn't sound much like an RPG to me. 71.203.209.0 00:50, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem lies with defining "RPG." Many don't consider Final Fantasy to be a true RPG, since everything (stats, storyline, character personalities, etc.) is predetermined. I think that, for now, Dragon Quest Swords roughly falls in the console role-playing game genre. We'll have to wait for more details till we revise. --Tristam 00:53, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

it's not an rpg, ign.com dosn't mark it as an rpg, i changed it to "First-person adventure" the only thing really that comes close to an rpg element is the leveling system--Sabu99 10:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed Date

Please do not delete the North American date that has been recently posted. It was also confirmed by Square Enix -- that they would be releasing the game on February 28, 2008. Thank you -- Zeta26 17:46, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Requested move 3 November 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Closed, move already made Mike Cline (talk) 15:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Quest Swords: The Masked Queen and the Tower of Mirrors → Dragon Quest Swords – Someone did a copy-and-paste moving. But per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:SUBTITLE, I support moving to Dragon Quest Swords without subtitle. CAS222222221 (talk) 13:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dragon Quest Swords. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081206115259/http://www.square-enix.com/eng/pdf/ar/20080808_01.pdf to http://www.square-enix.com/eng/pdf/ar/20080808_01.pdf#page=11

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]