Jump to content

Talk:Dramanon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hey,Here's requesting Wiki folks to remove the orphan tag from the article. The article now links from the "Theatre in India" article. We have also introduced many links within the article.regards,Anshu.bora (talk) 10:07, 8 June 2009 (UTC) Anshu[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Dramanon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up

[edit]

I reworked the article, removing content that wasn't supported by sources and converting the long list of external links to inline citations where they were needed. I couldn't access two Hindu articles and left those in the External links for someone with a subscription. I removed productions and appearances that weren't supported by reviews. There appeared to be a lot of original research and some puffery. Any new content added needs to be verifiable. Schazjmd (talk) 00:49, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]