Talk:Dreamland (Doctor Who)

David Warner = Viperox?

David Warner is not playing the Viperox- he is playing the leader of the Viperox. Someone should read that article much more closely. If one were to have a quick look around the internet, you will find that the character he is playing is named Lord Azlok. This is according to some information leaked from the next issue of DWM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.176.93.227 (talk) 05:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

yeah you're correct. i guess someone fixed it. Viperox is his species. Lord Azlok is his name - Ramdomwolf 198.96.35.166 (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Merge or not

When the series is complete, does anyone think that it should the parts should be combined into one continuous prose, similar to the infinite quest? Andrewmcnabb (talk) 19:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

That huge episode summary was way too much so first thing I did was split the plots into six episodes and then I'm paring them down to more summary sized pieces. I'll still probably keep it in episodic segments - Ramdomwolf 198.96.35.166 (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Continuity

In Episode 1, the Doctor mentions Houdini; should there be a link to Planet of the Ood on the page about it? 86.140.182.88 (talk) 12:56, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't think so not unless Houdini was in the episode.. and he wasn't - Ramdomwolf 198.96.35.166 (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Pose to Pose

The person who insists that the animation style needs a source really needs to get their eyes examined. This is a statement of fact, it's not an opinion or belief and therefore doesn't need a source anymore then to actually look at the episode.

For specific examples, firstly read the article pose to pose on wikipedia, THEN watch the episode, notice as each particular movement stops, it is not a fluid transition to another movement, such as when the doctor is playing with the sonic screwdriver on the alien thingi in the bar. This animation method IS pose to pose because there is no smooth transition between movements.

Just because it's no directly stated doesn't make it any less true, because this is not an opinion, it's a simple observable and proven fact. - 124.176.91.166 (talk) 00:00, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia puts verifiability above facts. Drawing conclusions about the production without providing any sources is original research, which is not allowed. — Edokter • Talk • 23:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

So do we go through all the episodes of Wallace and Gromit and remove any references to claymation? Do we go to any live action series and remove references to it unless we find a specific reference in any production documentation or interview that states otherwise?

The Human Hand has 5 fingers [citation needed] - 121.216.198.177 (talk) 05:22, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry to point out, it's nothing like that. Recognizing "pose to pose" requires an expert eye. You certainly seem to be an expert, but most of us can't tell "pose to pose" from a Jackson Pollock masterpiece. That is why a citation is required. Please provide a reliable source showing us that you're correct so that it clicks within our untrained minds. DonQuixote (talk) 14:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

clean up

so I just watched this and I'm making some clean up changes, plot separated into 6 episodes then reducing them to just summary rather then overly detailed. added cast list. rerating (not sure how this procedure works so if I went too far I won't be butt hurt over that.. unlike my username issues *grumble*), few minor things. Reduction still in progress. I cleaned up episode 1-3 but I got work to do so if I remember I'll shrink down 4-6 later. If not.. well you now have my notes on my progress - Ramdomwolf 198.96.35.166 (talk) 16:55, 1 March 2011 (UTC)