Jump to content

Talk:Dropkick Murphys

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Celtic metal"?

[edit]

Why have we added Celtic metal to the Dropkicks page? I mean, whoever did it I can understand where they're coming from, but Celtic metal is based entirely on Celtic mythology in general (not singally Irish mythology). And plus, the Dropkicks rarely, in fact have never really placed any references to Irish mythology in their music (with one exception, the name of the song The Legend of Finn McCumhail) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.56.63.229 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 11 August 2005

Racist skinhead fans?

[edit]

Is it just my own experience or do the Dropkicks have a large following among racist skins? Is it even worth mentioning if it's true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.168.13.117 (talk • contribs) 05:03, 23 August 2005

Believe me, this is not true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.176.150.90 (talk • contribs) 05:56, 8 November 2005
How can you be both Irish and a skinhead? It's almost like (though not quite as extreme as) a Jewish Nazi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.214.3 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 9 November 2005
Not all skinheads are racists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.236.43.143 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 10 November 2005
Real skinheads come from the UK, racist or not, Irish they ain't. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.5.214.3 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 10 November 2005
Well, I wouldn't advise you to say that in any South Boston neighborhoods you may happen to visit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.238.224.19 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 11 November 2005
["How can you be both Irish and a skinhead?"] I'd debate this. Northern Ireland has the highest number of racial attacks in the UK, and it can't be just blamed on Unionists. To say that Irish people cannot be racist is such a pathetic assumption. Obviously the Irish were attacked by the racists in the UK but your argument cannot be so clear cut. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Tew (talk • contribs) 03:50, 6 March 2006
That's only if you're talking about Irish people all over. Republic of Ireland is one of the least racist nations, in fact its only recently that ROI has had its first racially motivated murder. Generally, they aren't a racist people (don't argue with me, I'm mixed race, my mother's Irish, I've been to Ireland twenty times and travelled most of the country and met loads of people who had no problem with my skin colour). You also say Northern Ireland, but that's Britain. Northern Ireland isn't technically part of the Republic of Ireland, and hence not "Irish." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.213.205.38 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 13 March 2006
I'm not saying ALL skinheads are racist, I'm saying that skinhead is as British as fish & chips wrapped in a Union Flag and am perplexed as to why an Irish-American band would want to jump on that particular bandwagon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.147.181 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 17 March 2006
They have tons of Oi! Skinhead influences, and I think the working-class themes from Oi! punk can be applied to irish especially, since southie irish can't really be more working-class.Pewpewlazers 01:49, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is clearly heading off topic, but the point is still valid. Firstly just because you have visited the country a number of times you can't say for definite there aren't racists in Ireland (read http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/rar/diary97to2000.html for example). You also say that Northern Ireland is part of Britain (not true as its part of the United Kingdom which is not the same thing) and that it isn't technically part of RoI - I think a sizeable proportion of the Catholics in the North would disagree. Basically all I am saying is that reality isn't as clear cut as you make out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Tew (talk • contribs) 23:55, 27 March 2006
The U.K and Britain are the same thing, hence the full title 'United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.0.12 (talk • contribs) 16:15, 6 June 2007
-Northern ireland is not part of Ireland. It's a completely seperate political entity, and catholics in the north are a fairly small minority. I also don't think that the people in the south who fought for irish indepedence would agree with you saying that it's all the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Display Name (talk • contribs) 03:09, 16 May 2006
To the immediately above paragraph, you really should read up on this subject in a bit more depth before spouting grossly simplistic banner headline opinions as if they were fact on globally accessible media. Firstly the Protestant/Catholic make-up of the population is roughly 45%/40% respectively, so Catholics are, I would say, a fairly large minority!) Secondly, you seem to misunderstand the basis of the Irish fight for independance from say - 1916. The idea was that independance would be gained for the whole of Ireland - however the British Government would not allow this, and so therefore a line was drawn on the map and Northern Ireland was Established in 1920, as it was politically expedient for the British Government at the time (I am being simplistic myself here, but that is the bare bones of what happened). As an entity Northern Ireland did not exist before this time. You seem to have some kind of strange idea that Northern Ireland and the South fought some kind of war?? To be honest I am puzzled as to what you are basing your argument on? The whole North/South thing is a lot more complicated than you have been led to believe - having an Irish relative and having been to the place does not automatically make anyone an expert! (TD - 17/10/06) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.196.140.125 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 17 October 2006
The original skinheads come from Jamaica that influenced working class English youths in the form of Ska. I think Agnostic Front would also debate that they can't be skinheads because they aren't from the UK. Please do some research before stating your beliefs as fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Tew (talk • contribs) 03:50, 6 March 2006
The original skinheads were INFLUENCED by Jamaican Rude Boys. Please do some research before stating your beliefs as fact.
Agnostic Front and Dropkick Murphys might be more approriately termed "plastic skinheads". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.147.181 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 17 March 2006
There were actually black skinheads in the UK. If the Jamaicans hadn't got very short or shaved heads then how can they have influenced the white skinheads? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Tew (talk • contribs) 23:55, 27 March 2006
I think you need to read up on what a skinhead is. Black people mostly have their hair cut short to this day - does that make them skinheads? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.147.181 (talk • contribs) 07:38, 30 March 2006
Yes considering that the original skinheads in the UK were dockers and were made up of black and white people. Paul Tew 17:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I went to a The Mighty Mighty Bosstones/Dropkick Murphys show at the Konocti Resort, and I saw a lot of racist skinhead-looking people. I saw this one guy that had his shirt off, had a giant eagle tattooed on his back, and at the bottom of the tattoo, it said "skinhead" and had a swastika. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.251.193 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 4 August 2008
Ken Casey says, "Alright, Nazis are not f--king welcome at a Dropkick Murphys show!" after beating the shit out of one [1]. MrTree 13:35, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Criticism

[edit]

Under the criticism subtitle, do you think we should add a reference to the song "Wicked Sensitive Crew?" I don't know whether it's a response to Screeching Weasel's song, but certainly that Dropkicks song is in response to the way people have placed them under an image of the "working class toughguy"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.202.44.66 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 8 January 2006

Yeah, it probably would be worth a mention as it does indeed seem like a response to the sorts of sentiments voiced in "Tightrope" and the criticism the Murphys have received. Whether the song is a serious effort to portray themselves as "sensitive punks" is another matter, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.245.35 (talk • contribs) 04:37, 14 January 2006
"In the same entry, King goes on to say...Dropkicks entertained the guitarist from far-right wing punk band Skrewdriver" - this is nonsense. There were two incarnations of Skrewdriver, the first in 1977 was not racist at all. Donaldson resurrected them in 1982 as the pro-Nazi band they're famous for. I think King doesn't make this distinction, because if it was the old guitarist from Skrewdriver, then there's no point to make. Also, the Dropkicks didnt "entertain" the guitarist, he merely showed up backstage. That's your point of view whether they interacted with him or not. Plut it's a rather biased source — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.189.213.82 (talk • contribs) 22:31, 15 January 2006

Info?

[edit]

I came here for info on the band, but all you've put on the site is negative criticism. Maybe y'all know some positive things about the band you could add? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.155.242.59 (talk • contribs) 03:09, 6 February 2006

Spicy McHaggis

[edit]

There's a link to "Spicy McHaggis," but it's recursive - the Spicy McHaggis page is a redirect straight back to the Dropkick Murphys page. What's up with that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.186.64 (talk • contribs) 00:13, 11 February 2006

Edits

[edit]

I changed a bit about the Dropkicks taking a break in February 2006. That's not possible because their last date on the European tour with Less Than Jake is 30 April, so that can't be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.201.220.169 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 25 February 2006

I rearranged the wording a bit in regards to "The Warrior's Code" featuring "the hits" 'Sunshine Highway' and Tessie. Both songs received a considerable amount of airplay, especially from stations local to the Boston area, but I don't think either would truly be considered "hits". Nhbelongstome 00:46, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the location of the bar that "The Dirty Glass" is about. Darcy's is in Quincy on the Milton line (West Quincy specifically). I know it's not a big deal but Milton is a dry town, so there are no bars within it's borders. Breeda 02/28/2007 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.204.155.241 (talk • contribs) 12:50, 28 February 2007

Removal of Criticism

[edit]

The criticism section was removed. It's out of place. The band pages for Screeching Weasel and the Queers do not have criticism sections (not even about something like "taking over the punk movement for the white middle class"). Besides, you can't infuse a page like this with racist intent on the basis of undocumented hearsay by people that are known to make inflammatory remarks (bandmembers from the Queers). The Dropkick Murphys are not racist. They've toured under the cause of racial unity before, and they've done shows in Asia. Please see the following text, which has as much, if not more, relevance and documentation than the criticism section: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.8.9 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 4 March 2006

THANK YOU for removing that criticism section, it was SO stupid and hypocritical. Honestly Punk Rock was not started as a preppy genre for middle class suburban kids and bands like the Dropkick Murphys who focus on working class pride are not "corrupting" or "warping" punk at all. There simply saving it from pop bands like the Queers! Common, the Dropkick Murphys, secretive neo nazi and racist Skrewdriver fans? I think not! - Chris Gilmore — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.115.98.253 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 6 May 2007

"There's a lot of people that are confused and even think that we're a racist band just because we have somewhat of a skinhead following," Casey said. "It's almost like you get sick of talking about this with so many people. I think anyone who buys our CDs and listens to the music would know we aren't. But most people who have that negative and closed-minded attitude don't listen to the music."

Ironically enough, the band has done tours to benefit the Anti-Racist Action group and participated in the Unity Festival to promote racial harmony.

"Sometimes I feel like I'm repeating myself over and over again to educate the public that not all skinheads are racist, and as a matter of fact there's a large majority of them that aren't," Casey said. "What with the power of the media and them seeming to want to keep that misinterpretation going because it's probably more entertaining, I find that it's almost like a battle you can't win."

Source: http://www.alligator.org/edit/detours/01-spring/010315/murphys.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.8.9 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 4 March 2006

I've just spent the last half hour or so looking for information about the criticism and couldn't find anything, at least from Frenzal Rhomb. It appears they're fond of the Dropkick Murphys. All the interviews I read were very positive between the two. As an added note, the portion is copied wholesale from the Queers page from their criticism of modern punk. Please, one place or the other - not both.
65.78.8.9 20:35, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've looked around for sources for the information I've removed and cannot find a source for it. If you're going to revert the page can you please at least source the information you're putting back in? As far as I can tell the Frenzal Rhomb information is patently false, as all the interviews I've read Frenzal Rhomb has nothing but good things to say regarding Dropkick Murphys. And with respect to the criticism made by the Queers, it's already on the Queers page. Why are the Dropkick Murphys singled out? The quote is also applied to Rancid. I'm thinking this is such an issue because it's removal of criticism. There are surely things to criticize Dropkick Murphys for, but can you at least verify them and cite the source when you put it in? I know band pages don't seem to have the same sourcing as the other articles, but that should definitely change. Cite things you've put in! 65.78.8.9 23:05, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've found a source for the Queer's criticism: http://www.vueweekly.com/articles/default.aspx?i=3048 I'm not sure how reliable the site is. However, the Queers also mention Anti-Flag by name here. If you find it necessary to include this information in this article (as it is already in the Queers article), you should probably put it in the Anti-Flag article, as well. Thoughts? 65.78.8.9 23:10, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is just the kind of silly partisan censorship that kills Wikipedia. Whether or not the criticism is valid in your view and whether or not the pages for other bands are similarly structured, it is a fact that criticism has been directed at DM by very well-known punk bands and that this has had significant ramifications for the punk community. Removing this information from public view makes nobody smarter. It seems, from reading above, that DM have a cogent response to their critics. Why not put that out in public view so their critics, and those inclined to agree with them, can be informed of DM's response? Simply wiping relevant commentary on a band just because you don't like it is very, very childish. The Queers and Frenzal Rhomb quotes come from Joe Queer's weblog on The Queers' website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.246.42 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 15 March 2006
It's also hard to see how the criticism is "out of place". Simply because you do not like or agree with it does not make it so. The criticism that the Murphys have attracted from leading pop-punk bands like Screeching Weasel and The Queers has caused (or at least reinforced) divisions within the punk community and, as such, is a good part of what makes this band relevant outside of their fanbase. Removing anything critical - or even analytical - from the page reduces this to a puff-piece that could be lifted from the band's webpage. What good does that do anyone outside of the band themselves?
The Frenzal Rhomb anecdote was recounted by Joe Queer in his weblog, as is clearly mentioned in the text. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.247.246.42 (talk • contribs) 10:54, 15 March 2006
Thanks for your reply. In the future, please sign your comments with four tildes (~). In addition, please refrain from making personal attacks (eg. "silly" with reference to partisan censorship, along with the allegation that it "kills Wikipedia." and actions being "very, very childish"). Your note on including the criticism because it is from "notable" pop-punk bands is odd, because notability is largely a function of opinion when dealing with topics outside of the mainstream. I am also aware that it was "clearly mentioned in the text." How about finding a link to it? In my opinion, what's "killing Wikipedia" is information that hasn't been sourced at all. And finally, the text indicating that the response does not answer the main thrust of the argument is wrong. The insinuation is that DM are racist by association. Thanks. 65.78.8.9 22:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The last sentence of the criticisms is very confusing.Will 02:56, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the thing to do when confronted with a paragraph of unsourced gossipy speculation is not to write another paragraph of counter-arguments, but remove everything that is improperly sourced. See Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Reliable sources for what we are looking for as article content. Jkelly 21:36, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where to start. I happen to stumble upon this discussion and decided to do some research of my own and easily found at least 2 interviews with Joe Queer where he bashed the Dropkick Murphy's (and the Irish and working class, but that's for another forum). I agree that the critisim section should be included and of course cited. Here are the links I was able to find. http://www.rocknworld.com/thrashpit/reviews/07/QueersInterview.shtml and http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=9241014431&topic=4107 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.59.125.39 (talk) 14:42, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing 13 March 2006

[edit]

I altered the bit about Spicy McHaggis' reason for leaving, after reading several interviews on the band's website that he met an English woman on tour and left to marry her. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.213.205.38 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 13 March 2006

Skinhead

[edit]

Seeing as what lies above started with the question about the Dropkicks having a following of racist skins, it's fair to say that whether or not the Dropkicks have a following of racist skins is no reason to denounce them as a racist band. In fact, there's not much reason to assume that their skinhead following does have racist skins in it. That's not to say that they're not racist because they're Irish (or Irish American even), it's because they just aren't racist. Basically, just because a band may have racist fans who "like" their music doesn't make the actual band racist. It's a big accusation to be calling someone racist or accusing them of having Nazi sympathies, so be careful next time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.213.205.38 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 13 March 2006

→–Yes, it's a rediculous argument. I used to know a bunch of racist skins that listen to a great deal of non-punk, country music. Who gives a shit if a lot of racist people listen to their music? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.38.10.212 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 25 May 2008
Adolf Hitler enjoyed Disney films, did that make Walt Disney a racist? of course not. To the person above^ I agree with what you are saying, but Walt Disney was a racist.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.80.46.189 (talk) 04:47, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

[edit]

I just edited some bits in the text, punctuation, and I've also revamped the Criticism/Repsonse to Criticism. It just looked like a plain copy and paste jobby, so I added a link to the interview that Casey did. And racist by association? What's that supposed to mean? That because a band happens to belong to a scene that has a racist MINORITY (might I point out), they themselves are racist? Very narrow minded indeed. That's as narrow minded as saying that all white people hate non-white people. Your treading on thin ice there. As I said earlier, it's a huge allegation to call someone racist, in any form, by association or whatever. Do you think King has actually listened to the Dropkicks music? Of course not. Him and Weasel have obviously got this "Us versus Them" mentality, that the Pop-punk community is at odds with the Street punk/Oi communities because one is Liberal and the other is about working class pride and solidarity. And I completely agree with whoever suggested criticism for Screeching Weasel ("taking over the punk movement for the white middle class" i think it was"). These guys are trying to separate punk from its working class roots (but that's my opinion). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.215.206.176 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 23 May 2006

Lars reference

[edit]

Should it really say "Following the release, Lars Frederiksen, who had produced Dropkick's first two albums, exited to pursue other interests, and Barton also left the band..."

In this context it sounds as if he was an actual band member, rather than serving as producer which he has done for many Hellcat bands. Though it is true that he filled in on one tour when James broke his arm. --Sfurey77 03:17, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DKM/ Skrewdriver Connection

[edit]

This rumor of Dropkicks "entertaining 'the guitarist' of Skrewdriver" is completely unfounded and has no place in the wikipedia article on this band.

First of all, there were many guitarists in Skrewdriver, and considering that this does not name who the alleged person was, this claim is simply not credible. In addition, Skrewdriver has not been a band since Ian Stuart Donaldson died 13 years ago.

Then, whoever it was that was saying that being Irish and a skinhead is like being Jewish and a skinhead needs to seriously investigate history and culture. You may be surprised to learn that there actually has always been Jewish, black and all other ethicities of skinheads in America, all along. And, in England, where the skinhead culture came from, the original skins of the 60's hung out with black "rude boys". Then, when skinheads experienced a revival in the late 70's in England, there were black skinheads, and, at the same time, the cult moved over to Ireland and Northern Ireland,as well as North America. There have been skinheads in Ireland since then. I'd suggest you have a limited understanding of the relationship between England and Ireland. It's not all bombs and animosity, as you may think. There is actually much immigration and tourism between the two countries. And, there are many shared customs, including fish n chips, as you pointed out, and yes, even the skinhead culture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beaner71 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 2 July 2006

Added 'Boston Drops the Gloves' to Discography

[edit]

Added the Slapshot tribute album 'Boston Drops the Gloves' to the compilation section of the discography. DM contribute the last song, "I've Had Enough". If I remember correctly, DM were pretty instrumental in getting this comp recorded and released. DM has long been supporters of Slapshot - if anyone every gets around to re-writing this article, perhaps DM's links to 'classic' Boston hardcore can be brought out a little more... I'm not a big fan of the band, so I'm not qualified to do so... --Dc johnson45 01:57, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not from South Boston

[edit]

The dropkick murphys are not from south boston. They are mostly from dorchester. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.38.223.247 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 25 September 2006

True enough. Don't have time to source it ATM, but if someone takes a look they'll see it. --Blacken 04:38, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Covers section

[edit]

As a list, this is inappropriate. I recommend removal. If you want to highlight traditionals or other covers on each album, do so on the album's page. Or if its a notable traditional (Rocky Road to Dublin), just link to the song's page. Bjart 20:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If there's no disagreement, I will set about doing this in the next few days. If anyone think's a particular nonalbum cover is noteworthy, I'd suggest working it into the main entry. Bjart 19:05, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is what I removed today. If anyone wants to work this into the articles for each album as appropriate, please feel free to do so. Bjart 20:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Over the years, Dropkick Murphys have covered a number of different songs from many different genres, giving them their own feel. Below is a list of songs that they've rerecorded.


Why not just make a separate page List of songs covered by the Dropkick Murphys? 128.148.155.76 (talk) 14:18, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

[edit]

Can anyone deal with the infobox please? I can't seem to fix it myself... Wathiik 13:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Four Dead Cheerleaders: Drop vs. Dropkick Murphy

[edit]

I have not found the song "Four Dead Cheerleaders" listed in any of Dropkick Murphys discography. Come to find out that this song is FREQUENTLY miss-attributed to Dropkick Murphy and should be attributed to a different band; possibly Australian; possibly named Drop. Does anyone know this song. I want to include a note on this page that FDC was not written by DKM, but I want to clear-up who DID write it first.

-Milligan — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.26.180.198 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 1 December 2006

Or possibly named Dropkick. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.26.180.198 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 1 December 2006

According to last.fm it's a Texas punk band named Dropkick (there are at least two bands named Dropkick, one in Texas and one in Scotland.) Edited accordingly.
- Hillary —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flickeringice (talk • contribs) 20:14, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Folk Metal

[edit]

Does anybody agree with me that this band should be classified as folk metal? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marion Sudvarg (talk • contribs) 20:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I don't agree. And really, it's not up to me. Or you. But definitive sources. If you've got a reputable reference or citation that calls these guys Folk Metal, we can offer this classification up for further scrutiny. Little tinyfish (talk • contribs) 04:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
I also don't agree. Folk punk/Celtic punk yes, folk metal no ChrisTheDude 08:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There not metal in the least bit, they are completely punk. Some songs are a little harder and faster than others, but their style does not fit in with the metal genre at all! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.115.98.253 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 6 May 2007

Citation?

[edit]

Hi,
I'm the one who added the last bit about the origin of the name "Dropkick Murphy's'. I notice that someone said that it needed a citation. I'm not sure what to do about that. Although I was never a customer of that detox, I knew several old guys who had been. I have no idea how to look up Bellows Farm after all these years. They went out of business at least 30 years ago. Maybe as much as 40 or 50 years ago. Tommurphy.us 00:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What you have added is called Original Research, which is not allowed in Wikipedia. Every bit of information should be verifiable through another notable source, like a magazine, book, website, television show, etc. If Wikipedia allowed original research, inaccuracies would begin to run rampant because "I said so." That being said, your information should be excluded until a source can be located. I'll hide it behind a comment to give you some time to find one. Little tinyfish 04:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I found a source for references for the detox. I should get them in about two weeks. Perhaps they will be enough to post a separate article about John Murphy's drunk farm. Tommurphy.us 17:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject

[edit]

Is anyone interested in creating a WikiProject for DKM? Shapiros10 (talk) 15:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a good idea. I really just started editing so idk how to make wiki project. But I'd be glad to help.--CrazyOmega (talk) 11:57, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flanagan's Ball

[edit]

"I stepped out and I stepped in again," where have you heard that before? "You put your left foot in, you take your left foot out...shake it all about." Aren't we getting juvenile.--76.212.156.175 (talk) 13:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's a cover version of the Clancy Brothers' "Lannigan's Ball," and has nothing to do with the "Hokie Pokie." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.143.91 (talk) 01:47, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flogging Molly?

[edit]

What is the relationship of these two bands? I had a few Dropkick's CDs before FM had any records out or played out nationally, and though they had a kind of Irish feel, mostly vocally, they seemed straight ahead punk. Sometime after I discovered and beame a fan of FM I saw DM added more traditional instruments to their sound. Does anyone know if there is an influence from one band to another? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.164.147.147 (talk) 21:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is. They're just the two most popular celtic punk bands. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.220.252.190 (talk) 22:37, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dropkick Murphys are friends with Flogging Molly and Ken further confirms this in a according to a March 2010 interview with alt porn site, Burning Angel. They have toured with them in the past and are also friends with The Pogues of course and The Tossers (who btw formed before FM and DKM). Jason1978 (talk) 11:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic F.C???

[edit]

"The group is also well known for their affiliation with Celtic FC, the Boston Red Sox baseball team, and the Boston Bruins hockey team." There affiliation with the Red Sox and Bruins is well known but Celtic F.C?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.221.208.79 (talk) 13:49, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I came on here for too. I think the played a song at Celtic Park during half-time, as 'entertainment' but there's no working relationship between the two as there is with DKM and the Sox, and to a lesser extent DKM and the Bruins. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.46.235.134 (talk) 16:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
They are definitely Celtic fans, and wear the team jersey a lot —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.16.115.133 (talk) 03:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would hardly say wearing Celtic tops makes them well known for their affiliation with Celtic FC. I somehow doubt they are season ticket holders or have even went to an old firm match. 78.149.86.176 (talk) 22:17, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In fact they played at the Glasgow Celtic Park before the game Celtic Glasgow-Livingston FC. That's it, nothing more, they are not season ticket holder (they live in USA, not Scotland)Check out the french article, it is referenced every links DKM have with sports. --Bls2009 (talk) 07:47, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plastic paddies

[edit]

As the vast, vast majority of Irishman (which I am one)consider the Dropkick Murphys to be 'Plastic Paddies'. I have entered a link to 'Plastic Paddies' under the 'see also' section. 78.144.119.104 (talk) 22:30, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Dropkick Murphys are considered Plastic paddies here in Ireland therefore I think their should be a link on the 'see also' secion of this article. 78.150.222.175 (talk) 03:20, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's an incorrect label considering that they represent a unique cultural subset, that of the Boston Irish American, which has taken on its own legitimacy. The definition for "Plastic Paddy" does not match this. -someone not logged in to their name on a public computer 5000 miles from home. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.146.160.51 (talk) 14:49, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That unique cultural subset is referred to as Plastic Paddy syndrome in Ireland. You are unlikely to be Irish yourself, hence your ignorance and failure to understand how Irish poeple perceive themselves and their own culture, It is you who is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.78.4 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 25 November 2009

Sports section

[edit]

I've removed one of those inflationary "trivia" boilerplate warnings from the bulleted list of sports references. The warning reads "please relocate any relevant information into appropriate sections or articles". You may argue well whether or not such a section is relevant, or if any individual entries are relevant. But no matter what, this sort of information belongs in a separate bulleted section, and shouldn't be randomly scattered all over the article. So please don't put the warning back in just because you're seeing a bulleted list.Jimmy Fleischer (talk) 12:57, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Associated Acts

[edit]

Okay the associated acts section has about 20 too many, so I removed it...here are the bands that were listed:

So which are notable associations and which aren't? That's my two scents 22:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the most notable would be The Bruisers, the original band of Al Barr, Street Dogs, Mike McColgan's (former lead singer) current band, and Everybody Out!, the current band of Rick Barton. You could also argue The Ducky Boys because James Lynch was in the band and they recorded a split with DKM and The Outlets because it was Barton's band prior to DKM. --Matt58 (talk) 15:14, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FRENCH ARTICLE

[edit]

I think this article need a lot more references, someone should have a look to the french article about Dropkick Murphys on wikipedia. I's a lot better than the english one. --Bls2009 (talk) 08:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

VANDALISM

[edit]

Page needs cleaning up/restoring as somebody has decided to be juvenile and vandalise it.Gedmundo (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted the article back to a pre-vandalised version. If it happens again, feel free to revert or correct vandalism. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Just for future reference, how would you revert the article back to it's pre-vandalised state in one go as opposed to editing everything individually? Gedmundo (talk) 01:33, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'll comment on your talk page - it'll be easier for you to re-read later. Baffle gab1978 (talk) 13:23, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Cohen

[edit]

Seth Cohen continues to be added to list of band members but I have found no verifiable source to this fact. Does anyone have a source for him being a member of the band? (XFEM Skier (talk) 04:36, 20 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

I understand he's a character on a TV show called "The OC". "Walkaway" appeared in one episode of that show. MrTree 13:31, 21 March 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrTree (talk • contribs)

Scruffy

[edit]

To Whom it may concern,
Is Scruffy Wallace still in the band? The last two show i seen, he was not on stage. Please inform.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.84.21.34 (talk) 22:23, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Dropkick Murphys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:01, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on 5/30?

[edit]

I think the edit made on 5/30/16 (by a random IP) might be vandalism. It looks like somebody did a find and replace of "Boston" or "Masachusetts" to Ireland, including the name of their song "I'm shipping up to Boston" which broke the page link. I don't know the band well enough to correct any of the information, but I did fix the broken infobox (because a bracket was left off in the edit).Devilsbane (talk) 14:41, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dropkick Murphys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dropkick Murphys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:26, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Dropkick Murphys. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fenway park streaming concert

[edit]

They are doing a concert to raise funds for Boston resiliency fund, habitat for humanity, feeding America from their website. They claim first concert from an empty stadium. Guest stars include Bruce Springsteen singing the red rose song. AndresMP.wiki (talk) 00:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dropkick_Murphys&oldid=1207039322"