Talk:Dubh Artach/GA1
GA Reassessment[edit]
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.
This is a really nice article with which I only have two issues:
- The sources used need to include the page number(s) of the books/journals being relied on for the information.
- The lead is just a little too short to adequately summarise the article.
--Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:03, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
- That's brilliant, thanks. Just one remaining question; there are a few citations to Stevenson (1872), which isn't included in the sources. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 19:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
- Scrub that, I see what's happened. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 19:53, 8 September 2008 (UTC)