Talk:Dublin Broadstone railway station
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Luas Line BXD. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dublin Broadstone railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713060619/http://www.ironroadaaron.com/broadstone/index.htm to http://www.ironroadaaron.com/broadstone/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dublin Broadstone railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926222322/http://archives.tcm.ie/businesspost/2001/03/25/story645685928.asp to http://archives.tcm.ie/businesspost/2001/03/25/story645685928.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dublin Broadstone railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110517054615/http://www.industrialheritageireland.info/TikiWiki/tiki-index.php?page=Broadstone+Station to http://www.industrialheritageireland.info/TikiWiki/tiki-index.php?page=Broadstone+Station
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Suggested Refs
[edit]- archiseek.com/2010/1850-broadstone-railway-station-constitution-hill-dublin/
Djm-leighpark (talk) 02:00, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
Rail scot source
[edit]An editor ( @10mmsocket: ) dislikes the use of the Railscot source. See diff here. He/she says that it fails WP:UGC and WP:SPS, this is not a reliable source WP:RS. I dispute that it meets the criteria for self-published sources. Laurel Lodged (talk) 14:51, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_376#railscot.co.uk 10mmsocket (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Take a look at the last two pages of the given reference. This confirms beyond doubt that this particular document is the work of one man and is both inaccurate and incomplete. It is by definition both self-published source and user-generated content and is therefore not a reliable source. 10mmsocket (talk) 17:17, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- So you admit that it does not breach UGC or SPS?Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- What?? Of course it breaches both of them, it is the work of one man and is self published. 10mmsocket (talk) 08:56, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- Uh? 10mmsocket is right, it does breach both. An RS discussion, which he linked to, concluded it an unreliable source. Not sure what the fuss is about
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
- So you admit that it does not breach UGC or SPS?Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)