Talk:Ducommun

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

POV check nomination[edit]

I've nominated this article to be checked for POV. Particularly in the second half of the article, the text is very promotional, not objective, and it omitted important (yet controversial) elements of the company's history, such as the Boeing dispute that I added. Aaron Ray (talk) 05:13, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

737NG Structural Failures[edit]

In 2009 - 2010 three B737-700 NG planes, Turkish Airlines Flight 1951, American Airlines Flight 331, and AIRES Flight 8250 broke apart during hard landings. In each case, the fuselage broke apart into three pieces with the structural failure occurring at the same point of assembly where the Ducommon-fabricated chords (ribs) were joined. Ducommon's fabrication methods were reviewed by Boeing inspectors who were later fired by Boeing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dR5QIPxfHoE#t=787 Santamoly (talk) 06:18, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]