Talk:Duke of Silesia

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Silesia (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Silesia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.SilesiaWikipedia:WikiProject SilesiaTemplate:WikiProject SilesiaSilesia articles

My edit[edit]

I removed the tables, because I didn't like the inconsistency, and I removed the Polish names of the rulers and some Polish text snippets because this is the English Wikipedia. See WP:EN Karasek (talk) 11:46, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Tables look better than plain lists, and we should be converting all info to tables, not the other way around. And Polish names for Polish dukes are only logical. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 10:36, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then please add tables. And no duke after 1202 was a Polish duke, they were either independent or subject of the Bohemian crown. A few of them however rules shortly over parts of divided Poland. If the Polish names are so important we have to add all the German and Czech names too, maybe also some Hungarian and why not also Latin? I don't want this mess. I think this is one reason for WP:UE, because it prevents such discussions. But you are the admin and probably know it better.

I will restore my version a) because the design is consistent, b) it follows WP:UE and c) the naming is consistent. Karasek (talk) 11:39, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing tables. As for names, I think that German and Czech names may be useful, too. Please help expand the article, not censor it. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 07:54, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The colourful tables are absolutely worthless except perhaps as psychedelic art. Srnec (talk) 19:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Srnec, I just happened upon this. I can't make heads or tales of it. Drmies (talk) 21:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

Very large article that is hard to read. Section headers are a bit out of control: "To avoid accessibility problems, headings should not normally contain links, especially where only part of a heading is linked." MOS:HEAD --Hutcher (talk) 02:41, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Mieszko the Fat.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:56, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]