Talk:Dunster Working Watermill/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 20:23, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Nominator Rodw has been the predominant editor, with minor edits by others.
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
Images are from the Geograph website and licensed for reuse on Creative Commons.

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Rodw, I have two questions. Please see below. — Maile (talk) 21:47, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"The stables and waggon house were converted into a cafe." needs re-wording. It's worded exactly as PG 71 of its PDF source.
"There is a doorway on the first floor to allow the corn to be lifted up to the top of the building" tied to Source 13. I see in that source where it mentions the doorway. I don't see where it mentions corn, except earlier in the paragraph. Am I missing something in the way that reads?

Thanks for your comments. I have reworded those two sentences - is that any better?— Rod ^talk 06:57, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good now. I am happy to pass this nomination. — Maile (talk) 12:18, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]