Talk:Durham Red

Comics: British Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by British comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I wish it would Rayne

Removed this: The character, Rayne, from the videogame series BloodRayne shows a strong similarity to Durham Red. --as it's a matter of opinion. "Hot vampire chick with guns" is not exclusive to these two characters. Noclevername 07:29, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added it back. The similarity is significantly more than just "hot vampire chick with guns". Still, I'll admit the motif is somewhat overdone. --Mdwyer 17:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if the similarity is "signifigantly more", it shouldn't be hard to find cites for it. If it can be cited, leave it in. If not, out it goes as OR. -- Noclevername (talk) 21:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Its bloody obvious the Durham red was shamlessly riped off in BloodRayne. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.7.34 (talk) 15:17, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Provide some proof. Allegations of plagiarism are very serious. To date, with all your vandalism to the BloodRayne pages, you have not supplied even one credible, third party source for your claims. Web Warlock (talk) 15:29, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

personal attack removedhow the two characters are similar and provide some proof. Your edits will be reverted every single time if you dont.

Concerning the strong similarity to Durham Red, its pretty ovbious. Just looking up pics of them proves it. It would really need a source if it said "The character Rayne from Bloodrayne was inspired by Durham Red". THROUGH FIRE JUSTICE IS SERVED! 22:42, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

personal attack removed, just a look at both characters shows that Durham Red was copied for BloodRayne, the cover of BloodRayne was almost a carbon copied of 2000AD prog 1111 and not to mention the fact they use the same cloths and weapons. The only minor difference between the characters is that Red is British and Raynes a yank. Do so research before you make edits on pages you clearly know nothing about. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.128.47 (talk) 22:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Finally you talking. You are saying plagiarism. You dont go around claiming that, as its copyright violation, so you MUST provide a source, more than just some pictures. But, alas, you still sound like just fan of Durham Red who enraged they look similar, and will not it go, personal attack removed. THROUGH FIRE JUSTICE IS SERVED! 23:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References Setion

Added a references section. Looking for some more information now. IF (and that is a really big IF) a lawsuit was actually filed then there would be a record of it somewhere. So far I have found nothing. Web Warlock (talk) 15:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention the development of any more Bloodrayne games is supposedly barred....thats pretty serious. Now I know that info would be on like IGN. But it isn't......THROUGH FIRE JUSTICE IS SERVED! 23:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TRI mentioned some time ago that there would be no more BloodRayne because of finacial problems with the company. That was also on the now defunct UK BloodRayne fan site. But I need to find a solid ref for that before I put it on a page. Web Warlock (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the claim has been denied, but still nothing as to who made the claim to begin with. ("they look alike" isn't a viable citation, see Wikipedia:Common knowledge.) -- Noclevername (talk) 01:46, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Durham Red. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160822082910/http://www.actiontrip.com/features/atstop10videogamechicks.phtml to http://www.actiontrip.com/features/atstop10videogamechicks.phtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The whole "Knots Landing continuity" paragraph, could it be removed?

She has since appeared in several of the Strontium Dog revived series stories set after Alphers return from the dead. Her own series just said he was dead, and was set thousands of years into the future when he would have been anyway so it could still work out.86.187.167.151 (talk) 17:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; deleted. Richard75 (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Durham Red. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]